1. Home
2. Evaluation form

Evaluation form

Full name

Position (optional)

Country - Select -AfghanistanAland IslandsAlbaniaAlgeriaAmerican SamoaAndorraAngolaAnguillaAntarcticaAntigua and BarbudaArgentinaArmeniaArubaAustraliaAustriaAzerbaijanBahamasBahrainBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBeninBermudaBhutanBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBotswanaBouvet IslandBrazilBritish Indian Ocean TerritoryBritish Virgin IslandsBruneiBulgariaBurkina FasoBurundiCambodiaCameroonCanadaCape VerdeCaribbean NetherlandsCayman IslandsCentral African RepublicChadChileChinaChristmas IslandCocos (Keeling) IslandsColombiaComorosCongo (Brazzaville)Congo (Kinshasa)Cook IslandsCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCuraçaoCyprusCzech RepublicDenmarkDjiboutiDominicaDominican RepublicEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEquatorial GuineaEritreaEstoniaEthiopiaFalkland IslandsFaroe IslandsFijiFinlandFranceFrench GuianaFrench PolynesiaFrench Southern TerritoriesGabonGambiaGeorgiaGermanyGhanaGibraltarGreeceGreenlandGrenadaGuadeloupeGuamGuatemalaGuernseyGuineaGuinea-BissauGuyanaHaitiHeard Island and McDonald IslandsHondurasHong Kong S.A.R., ChinaHungaryIcelandIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsle of ManIsraelItalyIvory CoastJamaicaJapanJerseyJordanKazakhstanKenyaKiribatiKosovoKuwaitKyrgyzstanLaosLatviaLebanonLesothoLiberiaLibyaLiechtensteinLithuaniaLuxembourgMacao S.A.R., ChinaMacedoniaMadagascarMalawiMalaysiaMaldivesMaliMaltaMarshall IslandsMartiniqueMauritaniaMauritiusMayotteMexicoMicronesiaMoldovaMonacoMongoliaMontenegroMontserratMoroccoMozambiqueMyanmarNamibiaNauruNepalNetherlandsNetherlands AntillesNew CaledoniaNew ZealandNicaraguaNigerNigeriaNiueNorfolk IslandNorth KoreaNorthern Mariana IslandsNorwayOmanPakistanPalauPalestinian TerritoryPanamaPapua New GuineaParaguayPeruPhilippinesPitcairnPolandPortugalPuerto RicoQatarReunionRomaniaRussiaRwandaSaint BarthélemySaint HelenaSaint Kitts and NevisSaint LuciaSaint Martin (French part)Saint Pierre and MiquelonSaint Vincent and the GrenadinesSamoaSan MarinoSao Tome and PrincipeSaudi ArabiaSenegalSerbiaSeychellesSierra LeoneSingaporeSint MaartenSlovakiaSloveniaSolomon IslandsSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth Georgia and the South Sandwich IslandsSouth KoreaSouth SudanSpainSri LankaSudanSurinameSvalbard and Jan MayenSwazilandSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanTajikistanTanzaniaThailandTimor-LesteTogoTokelauTongaTrinidad and TobagoTunisiaTurkeyTurkmenistanTurks and Caicos IslandsTuvaluU.S. Virgin IslandsUgandaUkraineUnited Arab EmiratesUnited KingdomUnited StatesUnited States Minor Outlying IslandsUruguayUzbekistanVanuatuVaticanVenezuelaVietnamWallis and FutunaWestern SaharaYemenZambiaZimbabwe

Since when have you been a HERE? (Year YYYY)

Content

How relevant was this seminar for you, your institution and your country? (please tick)

	Very relevant	Relevant	Some aspects were relevant but not all	Not very relevant
You	You - Very relevant	You - Relevant	You - Some aspects were relevant but not all	You - Not very relevant
Your institution	Your institution - Very relevant	Your institution - Relevant	Your institution - Some aspects were relevant but not all	Your institution - Not very relevant
Your Country	Your Country - Very relevant	Your Country - Relevant	Your Country - Some aspects were relevant but not all	Your Country - Not very relevant

If there are different levels of relevance (between yourself, your institution and your country), could you please explain?

Please rate the different sessions of the seminar

	Very relevant	Relevant	Some aspects were relevant but not all	Not very relevant
Keynote: The changing context of higher education: Tools and strategies to flexibilise learning and align it to emerging labour market and societal needs	Keynote: The changing context of higher education: Tools and strategies to flexibilise learning and align it to emerging labour market and societal needs - Very relevant	Keynote: The changing context of higher education: Tools and strategies to flexibilise learning and align it to emerging labour market and societal needs - Relevant	Keynote: The changing context of higher education: Tools and strategies to flexibilise learning and align it to emerging labour market and societal needs - Some aspects were relevant but not all	Keynote: The changing context of higher education: Tools and strategies to flexibilise learning and align it to emerging labour market and societal needs - Not very relevant
An introduction to micro-credentials: Definitions and current usages	An introduction to micro-credentials: Definitions and current usages - Very relevant	An introduction to micro-credentials: Definitions and current usages - Relevant	An introduction to micro-credentials: Definitions and current usages - Some aspects were relevant but not all	An introduction to micro-credentials: Definitions and current usages - Not very relevant
Plenary: Micro-credentials: Why all the fuss?	Plenary: Micro-credentials: Why all the fuss? - Very relevant	Plenary: Micro-credentials: Why all the fuss? - Relevant	Plenary: Micro-credentials: Why all the fuss? - Some aspects were relevant but not all	Plenary: Micro-credentials: Why all the fuss? - Not very relevant
Micro-credentials: Perspectives from institutions, employers and students	Micro-credentials: Perspectives from institutions, employers and students - Very relevant	Micro-credentials: Perspectives from institutions, employers and students - Relevant	Micro-credentials: Perspectives from institutions, employers and students - Some aspects were relevant but not all	Micro-credentials: Perspectives from institutions, employers and students - Not very relevant
Transparency with micro-credentials and recognition	Transparency with micro-credentials and recognition - Very relevant	Transparency with micro-credentials and recognition - Relevant	Transparency with micro-credentials and recognition - Some aspects were relevant but not all	Transparency with micro-credentials and recognition - Not very relevant
Conclusions and way forward: What have we learned?	Conclusions and way forward: What have we learned? - Very relevant	Conclusions and way forward: What have we learned? - Relevant	Conclusions and way forward: What have we learned? - Some aspects were relevant but not all	Conclusions and way forward: What have we learned? - Not very relevant

Please rate the different case studies (tick all that apply)

	Very relevant	Relevant	Some aspects were relevant but not all	Not very relevant	N/A
University of Zadar, Croatia	University of Zadar, Croatia - Very relevant	University of Zadar, Croatia - Relevant	University of Zadar, Croatia - Some aspects were relevant but not all	University of Zadar, Croatia - Not very relevant	University of Zadar, Croatia - N/A
Ghent University, Belgium	Ghent University, Belgium - Very relevant	Ghent University, Belgium - Relevant	Ghent University, Belgium - Some aspects were relevant but not all	Ghent University, Belgium - Not very relevant	Ghent University, Belgium - N/A
Dublin City University (DCU), Ireland	Dublin City University (DCU), Ireland - Very relevant	Dublin City University (DCU), Ireland - Relevant	Dublin City University (DCU), Ireland - Some aspects were relevant but not all	Dublin City University (DCU), Ireland - Not very relevant	Dublin City University (DCU), Ireland - N/A
Mälardalen University/Knowledge Foundation, Sweden	Mälardalen University/Knowledge Foundation, Sweden - Very relevant	Mälardalen University/Knowledge Foundation, Sweden - Relevant	Mälardalen University/Knowledge Foundation, Sweden - Some aspects were relevant but not all	Mälardalen University/Knowledge Foundation, Sweden - Not very relevant	Mälardalen University/Knowledge Foundation, Sweden - N/A

How would you evaluate the approach to the break-out groups?

	Very good	Good	Fair	Poor
The moderation	The moderation - Very good	The moderation - Good	The moderation - Fair	The moderation - Poor
The discussants	The discussants - Very good	The discussants - Good	The discussants - Fair	The discussants - Poor
The video case studies	The video case studies - Very good	The video case studies - Good	The video case studies - Fair	The video case studies - Poor
The time allocated	The time allocated - Very good	The time allocated - Good	The time allocated - Fair	The time allocated - Poor
The quality of the discussion between participants	The quality of the discussion between participants - Very good	The quality of the discussion between participants - Good	The quality of the discussion between participants - Fair	The quality of the discussion between participants - Poor

Did the content meet your expectations?

Yes

No

If no, please explain. What was missing in your opinion?

Please list at least three highlights from the content of the event (this may be a particular speaker or session, for example)

Organisation

This was the first SPHERE online event. How would you evaluation the approach to

	Very good	Good	Fair	Poor
The core participants versus the general HERE public	The core participants versus the general HERE public - Very good	The core participants versus the general HERE public - Good	The core participants versus the general HERE public - Fair	The core participants versus the general HERE public - Poor
The resources provided online prior to the event (Videos, links, background material)	The resources provided online prior to the event (Videos, links, background material) - Very good	The resources provided online prior to the event (Videos, links, background material) - Good	The resources provided online prior to the event (Videos, links, background material) - Fair	The resources provided online prior to the event (Videos, links, background material) - Poor
The ‘tasks’ required by the core participants prior to the event	The ‘tasks’ required by the core participants prior to the event - Very good	The ‘tasks’ required by the core participants prior to the event - Good	The ‘tasks’ required by the core participants prior to the event - Fair	The ‘tasks’ required by the core participants prior to the event - Poor
The division between public sessions and discussion groups	The division between public sessions and discussion groups - Very good	The division between public sessions and discussion groups - Good	The division between public sessions and discussion groups - Fair	The division between public sessions and discussion groups - Poor

Did you review the videos prior to the event?

Yes, all

Yes, some

No

Do you have any further suggestions you would like to provide from an organizational point of view?

How would you evaluate the Platform on which the event was provided?

Very good

Good

Fair

Poor

Did you have any connection problems?

Yes

No

Do you have any suggestions on how to improve the format of an online event for the HERE in the future?

Follow up

How do you intend to exploit the knowledge gained from this event?

How do you plan to disseminate what you learned within and beyond your institution?

How could the SPHERE Team help you in this respect?

Submit